Help me out, folks. The Liberals are about to commit a major folly, but no one, particularly Liberals, is saying anything about it.
Since election day, we’ve been treated to various explanations in newspapers by Liberal Party insiders as to what the party must do to rebuild after the May 2 debacle. Some of the advice was really good, particularly that provided by lifelong Liberals who also admitted that the party has been on a downward decline for years and that, lo and behold, it’s all the Liberals’ own fault – and not the fault of the NDP for having to audacity to surge at the most inopportune of times, and not the fault of the Conservatives for placing silly attack ads in the middle of Dancing With The Stars. (Although this prompts the question as to which is sillier – the Tory attack ads, or people who actually watch that show. Well, you be the judge.)
What was especially astounding was their willingness to do it right this time, that is, to take the time necessary to reform the Liberal Party and not to rush into new platforms or leadership races without really changing the party from the ground up first.
But all those positive suggestions have been brought to nought by the news that former prime minister Jean Chrétien, and one of the main reasons why Liberals have been unable to connect with voters, has put his oar in, phoned up virtually all remaining Liberal MPs and strongly “suggested” to them that Bob Rae should be made interim party leader for two years.
Now, Mr. Chrétien and Mr. Rae have been close for a very long time. What one favours, the other one supports, including a potential merger of the Liberal and NDP parties. It’s no surprise that Mr. Chrétien has decided to support Mr. Rae, for the latter is all that remains of the old Chrétien fan club.
But the party will lose even more popular support for allowing the old dinosaur to become involved again – and, no doubt, opening up old wounds and aggravating long-time factions. The feud between then-prime minister Mr. Chrétien and his then-finance minister Paul Martin is the stuff of legends, and credited as one of the primary contributing factors to the Liberal Party’s demise (that’s right, the Big Red Machine is dead). If the Chrétienites are allowed to call the shots and install their own favourite candidate as interim leader, it won’t be long before some Martinites rear their heads and start the feud all over again.
It won’t do much for the rebuilding effort either when the Old Guard starts pulling strings again. This goes against everything that more reasonable Liberals have been writing about since the morning after the election.
Mr. Chrétien’s involvement won’t just put off many inside the party, but will also drive even more voters away from the Liberal Party. Seeing Mr. Chrétien’s face, or being reminded of him and his past filled with corruption and billions of tax dollars misappropriated, will be more than enough to ensure that the rump caucus will lose official party status after the 2015 election.
Mr. Rae, too, comes with baggage from the time he was Ontario’s NDP premier. Rightly or wrongly, Ontarians hate the man with the same passion that Albertans experience at the thought of digging up the body of former Liberal prime minister Pierre Trudeau and killing him again and again. It’s easy to tell them to get over it, but as the example of Alberta shows as well, some grudges actually become worse and harder to shed as time goes by.
If the Liberals are serious about starting from scratch, they must tell Mr. Chrétien to stay home, to enjoy his retirement and, above all, to butt out. This isn’t his battle anymore.
It’s definitely Jeans battle he changed the financing laws to screw over martin and didn’t care that he took out the party in the process.
Libs are the party of really big business and they can no longer make the really big contributions.
Still
ha ha
Bob Rae can’t be that unpopular when he was reelected when many other Liberals in safer seats lost.
That is why I wrote “rightly or wrongly”. But I also think that if he had run in a different riding (in Toronto or Ontario), he would have lost his seat too.
The Liberals were in trouble when Chretien, who should have been sent into the wilderness for good when he retired, was seen at the party convention endorsing the likes of Dion and ‘dealmaking’ after Martin to elect a new leader leaving his mark on proceedings. His influence has done them no favours with his rivalry with Martin at the time and presently.
A dinosaur? Chretien like many politicians only ever was looking after ‘numéro un’ and that always leads to eventual extinction when you take matters too far as he did when he should have stayed way under the covers with his political games that people remembered and tired of.
The solution? Rebuild properly and let go of the past for Liberals because in politics, complacency is both a friend and foe. There are leaders if you know where to look and we need more of them in this land to enter and make a contribution to political life. A couple of ideas to ponder in a recent Globe article link that broached what Canadians want and maybe Liberals may learn from, if not all political parties.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/voters-want-harper-kept-on-short-leash-and-arent-yet-sold-on-layton-study/article2011180/
Great post ans spot on! I am still laughing at Warren Kinsella’s frustrated question … ‘I just can’t figure out what went wrong?’ – Liberals had been warned for quite some time that their brand was damaged (perhaps beyond repair).
Election Impossible To Explain – Warren Kinsella
They simply don’t get it. Their primary problem from this point on will be financial. Their caucus and research grants will be a mere fraction of what it was and they are going to have a huge problem dragging donations in from whatever grass roots remains. I think this is more than a ‘flesh wound’. It may well be that they received a mortal injury on May 2nd from which they will not recover.
Again, great post. Thanks & hope you are well!